Research Index
A human-readable map of the evidence, trust, and learning surfaces
Use this page when you need the whole site shape at once: orientation pages, source-led archives, field-guide tools, public review lanes, trust policies, and representative high-value articles.
What this research index adds
- It gives readers, reviewers, educators, and search evaluators a single place to see how the site is organized beyond isolated posts.
- It makes the trust architecture visible: About, Editorial Standards, Corrections, Privacy, Disclosures, Ad Policy, Evidence Gates, and Safe Sharing are part of the reading experience.
- It separates learning routes, source-led archives, review workflows, and storytelling lanes so pages are not mistaken for the same evidence type.
- It helps prevent low-value browsing by showing the next responsible route before a reader repeats a claim.
Orientation and trust
- About explains what makes the site valuable and how pages are built.
- Editorial Standards defines original value, source review, AI drafting boundaries, and article framing.
- Corrections Log keeps public changes, source tightening, and revision accountability visible.
- Privacy Policy, Safe Sharing, and Moderation Policy protect living people and public review quality.
- Disclosures, Ad Policy, and Sponsor Policy separate education from monetization and sponsor influence.
Learning and source routes
- Start Here gives the safest first reading order.
- Library routes readers into Wiki, Tales, Field Guides, Place Hubs, and review lanes.
- Foundations Learning Timeline, Place-Based Research Timeline, and Records and Public Memory Timeline explain how to use timeline rows without overclaiming.
- Visual Evidence Ledger gathers museum, archive, and government-source records into metadata-only source cards with rights status and claim boundaries.
- Muur/Moor Boundary Timeline keeps site framing and partner reading routes distinct.
- Verified Visual Evidence gathers museum, archive, and government records into a source-gated ledger that separates catalog language from project interpretation.
- Wiki contains source-led explainers with place anchors and claim boundaries.
- Tales contains labeled narrative, memory, and teaching pieces that are not proof by themselves.
- Field Notes and Updates shows methods, place updates, and public correction thinking as the site evolves.
- Original Thirteen Colonies Research Blueprint extends place-based research into colony-by-colony source lanes without turning source targets into certification claims.
Do-the-work tools
- Place Packet Worksheet starts with geography, institutions, routes, maps, and open questions.
- Source Table Worksheet separates exact source details, interpretation, privacy risk, and claim wording.
- Claim Review Card turns strong wording into a reviewable packet.
- Classroom Use Guide supports source literacy without identity-certification drift.
- Contributor Workflow prepares source leads, corrections, community notes, and fact-check requests safely.
Review and correction routes
- Research Method explains how evidence lanes are separated.
- Why Some Pages Stay Open explains why thin Starter/Open surfaces remain accessible but noindex,follow until expanded.
- Source Review decides whether a source trail can support stronger wording.
- Claim Review separates record, interpretation, oral tradition, spiritual reading, and open claims.
- Fact Check routes contested claims into evidence review.
- Community Notes accepts source leads, context, and public-safe correction pressure.
Representative high-value reads
- Yo He Wah, Black Drink, and Muscogee Sacred Memory shows flagship article framing, source limits, and evidence-gate reminders.
- St. Augustine Area Coastal Crossroads shows a source-led Wiki entry with a reader quality check.
- Build a Source Table Before You Write the Paragraph shows how a field note should route readers into method work.
- Fact Check: Montezuma, Georgia proves Aztec settlement shows claim review and safer wording discipline.
- The Earth Lodge Doorway shows narrative value with an evidence handoff.
What remains open
This index makes the site easier to inspect, but it does not replace page-level source review. If a claim touches identity, ancestry, descent, legal status, DNA, tribe, Nation, membership, Muur/Moor language, spiritual interpretation, oral tradition, or living people, use the review lanes before repeating stronger wording.