Partner Learning Path

TheFoundationsOf.us and MoorofUs.org are designed to work together without making one replace the other.

Audience frame: TheFoundationsOf.us is built first for Foundational Black Americans, with secondary learning paths for White Americans and all Americans who need evidence-led context, responsible language, and clear source limits.

What this page adds

• It helps readers choose the right site for the question they are actually asking.
• It prevents the common mistake of treating Muur history and Moor history as interchangeable labels.
• It explains why two partner sites can be connected without having identical editorial scope.
• It gives a practical handoff path instead of leaving readers to infer where context should continue.

TheFoundationsOf.us

TheFoundationsOf.us focuses on foundations, Muur history, ancestral memory, place-based research, community learning, source review, corrections, and safe sharing.

MoorofUs.org

MoorofUs.org is the Moor History Center. It focuses on Moor history, Moorish civilization, historical legacy, people, places, timelines, claims, sources, and historical context.

How to move between them

• Start on TheFoundationsOf.us when your question is about foundations, place hubs, family-safe research, community notes, or Muur identity framing.
• Continue to MoorofUs.org when your question needs wider Moor historical context, Moorish civilization, timelines, people, places, claims, or source sets.
• Return to TheFoundationsOf.us when you need to apply that context carefully to place-based research and community review.

Cross-site handoff rules

• Do not import a conclusion from one site into the other without checking the page purpose, evidence label, and source trail.
• Use MoorofUs.org for broader Moor historical context; use TheFoundationsOf.us for foundation framing, Muur learning paths, place hubs, safe sharing, and review workflows.
• When a topic touches both sites, name which part is historical context, which part is community interpretation, and which part still needs source review.
• If a reader cannot tell which site should own a claim, hold the wording and route it through Source Review.

Cross-site evidence boundary

• A link to a partner site is a reading route, not an endorsement that every claim on both pages has the same evidence level.
• Do not move language from one site into another without preserving the source label, claim status, privacy limits, and date of the page being cited.
• If a partner page changes the strength of a claim, treat the next step as source review or fact check rather than automatic republication.

Reader decision guide

Start with the site that matches the question, not the label that feels strongest. If the question is “what does this record, place, or family-safe source trail support,” stay here. If the question is “what wider Moor historical context helps interpret this,” continue to MoorofUs.org, then return here for careful application.

Reader handoff output

You should leave knowing which site fits the question you actually have, what evidence boundary traveled with you, and what review lane is needed before cross-site language becomes public wording.

Careful relationship language: Muur history and Moor history are related learning paths, but they should not be collapsed into the same concept.